It's Payday for the Loan Sharking
Industry
by Freddie Barber and
Craig Savell
Originally published in the
Here’s a trick question: If a financial transaction
looks like a loan, and acts like a loan, is it a loan? Well, not any more
according to
Former Attorney General Bryant successfully sued and
shut down at least two of these operations because they were violating
Here’s how it works. A customer writes a personal
check for the needed cash plus a fee. The lender knows that the borrower does
not have sufficient funds to cover the check, so they agree to advance cash but
hold the check until a specified date-usually the next payday. On that date,
the borrower can redeem the check with cash or allow the check to be deposited.
The interest rates for providing this “service” are astronomical. To receive
$100, a borrower can be required to write a check of $122.22 for a loan as
short a 6 days. That equates to an annual percentage rate (ARP) of 1352
percent.
When faced with the prospect of being prosecuted for
passing a bad check and having to pay a bounced check fee to their bank and the
merchant, some view the $22 for a $100 loan as a reasonable deal. However,
payday loans are more properly compared with other sources of small loans.
According to the Consumer Federation of America, the average payday loan is 485
percent
Desperate people write personal checks for money they
don’t have at the time and still won’t have later. The payday lending industry
often threatens to deposit the check and initiate criminal prosecution for bad
check writing, so borrowers are forced to take out additional payday loans in
even higher amounts, an endless cycle. Fees quickly compound, leaving borrowers
unable to repay rapidly expanding debt. Provisions in the
The deck is also stacked against borrowers who realize
they’ve been ripped off. Who would know to file complaints with the State Board
of Collection Agencies (SBCA), Division of Check Cashing? There is no
requirement for the lender to disclose that to the borrower. The SBCA is an
under-funded state office poorly equipped to handle consumer complaints with no
800 number, only one investigator to cover the over 300
lenders around the state, and very little enforcement authority.
Furthermore, many lenders make mandatory arbitration a condition of getting
loans, essentially leaving borrowers no option for legal redress.
Numerous regulatory actions and court decisions are
coming out against payday lenders around the country. State and federal courts
consistently find that payday loan transactions are credit transactions, not mere “check cashing” as the industry
argues. Most recently, the Federal Reserve Bank issued a decision that
effectively states that payday lending is in fact a loan, and the Kentucky
Supreme Court and a Tennessee federal judge ruled that deferring deposit was
not exempt from usury laws and credit disclosures.
The Arkansas Public Policy Panel recently started a
Consumer Organizing Project that is working to organize folk who want the
“check cashing” industry to play by the same rules as traditional lending
institutions. Fortunately, lawyers like
Todd Turner of Arkadelphia have declared war on this type of legal loan
sharking that preys on
those who live paycheck to paycheck, and can least afford the outrageous
interest rates charged and the criminal prosecution threatened by the industry.
Our officials should stand up for consumers and enforce the state’s usury
laws. Arkansans who use these services deserve legal protections that secure
their pocketbooks and their dignity. You can find out more about check cashing
heists in